20100126
Differences between revisions 7 and 8
31335
Comment:
|
32343
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 41: | Line 41: |
Line 67: | Line 68: |
== Alexander Sack (asac) == === Lightweight Browser === * Finalize Firefox 3.6 packaging and collect early feedback from community, fix package transition and get package in archive * build a chromium with thumb2+neon build in PPA for benchmark * finalize chromium packaging licensing; get first stab uploaded to NEW queue. * discuss benchmarking with mozilla * work on startup benchmark and try a few javascript benchmarks === uboot spec === * escalate uboot bugs to freescale === dove port === * various discussions thumb2/breakage with dove === Team/Communication === * Release Team Meeting * collect input on Alpha-3 planning and communicate to managers * work on sprint agenda === Other Contributions === * discuss uboot * sponsor/review fontconfig merge * MIR processing (uboot-imx) * sponsor/review network-manager, network-manager-applet and modemmanager * cleanup work items/blueprints for alpha-3 * discuss openoffice and python on arm with doko |
Contents |
January 26th, 2010, 13:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.
Agenda
Link to previous meeting
Action Items from January 19th, 2009
JamieBennett to complete imx51 backportng documentation on boot-speed.
- cooloney to investigate lucid kernel patches that may need back-porting.
- ericm and NCommander to investigate what causes the gnome-panel crash/restart cycle.
- asac, ericm, and NCommander to talk about Thumb2 issues after the meeting and report back.
- cooloney to ping fsl for more reliable chip rev checking method.
- cooloney to ping fsl about suspend.
- NCommander to investigate ericm's xorg naming bug.
- persia, asac, Gruemaster to discuss meeting rotation schedule and report back.
Current Items
- Readjustment of the meeting schedule to better fit current participants -- persia
Standing Items
http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/canonical-mobile.html
http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/canonical-mobile-lucid-alpha-3.html
- Kernel Status (cooloney, ericm)
QA Status (GrueMaster, plars)
ARM Application status (JamieBennett, dyfet)
- ARM Porting/FTBFS status (NCommander, dyfet)
- ARM Image Status (ogra, persia)
- Any Other Business
Action Items
JamieBennett to complete imx51 backportng documentation on boot-speed.
- cooloney to investigate lucid kernel patches that may need back-porting
- plars to file a bug on gnome-panel crashes
- NCommander to raise apport-retracer for armel from the dead
Minutes
- To be added.
Weekly Reports
Jamie Bennett (JamieBennett)
This Week
- Sucked into other projects, no direct work on my own blueprints.
Future
- Get netbook-launcher-efl into main this week.
- Finish casper speed-up work.
- Investigate kernel patches that may help boot speed on ARM devices.
- Write monthly public team report.
- Work on Mythbuntu.
David Sugar
This Week
- A few failed to builds for arm, including busybox
- Changed ARM default apps focus since we are not getting canola in time
- Tried a new canola build on arm
- Struggled with Lucid Dove
Future
- Learn entire image build process
- More ftb for arm and otherwise as part of lucid package QA
- Get Dove back up with Lucid
Alexander Sack (asac)
Lightweight Browser
- Finalize Firefox 3.6 packaging and collect early feedback from community, fix package transition and get package in archive
- build a chromium with thumb2+neon build in PPA for benchmark
- finalize chromium packaging licensing; get first stab uploaded to NEW queue.
- discuss benchmarking with mozilla
- work on startup benchmark and try a few javascript benchmarks
uboot spec
- escalate uboot bugs to freescale
dove port
- various discussions thumb2/breakage with dove
Team/Communication
- Release Team Meeting
- collect input on Alpha-3 planning and communicate to managers
- work on sprint agenda
Other Contributions
- discuss uboot
- sponsor/review fontconfig merge
- MIR processing (uboot-imx)
- sponsor/review network-manager, network-manager-applet and modemmanager
- cleanup work items/blueprints for alpha-3
- discuss openoffice and python on arm with doko
Meeting Log
13:03 < NCommander> Action Item Review 13:03 < NCommander> JamieBennett to complete imx51 backportng documentation on boot-speed 13:03 < JamieBennett> Last week was swallowed up by something else so no progress on that 13:03 -!- ericm_ [n=ycmiao@112.65.48.82] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 13:03 < NCommander> cooloney to investigate lucid kernel patches that may need back-porting 13:04 < asac> [ACTION] JamieBennett to complete imx51 backportng documentation on boot-speed 13:04 < ogra> Bug 512321 has a fix and shoves off 2 seconds :) 13:04 < ubottu> Launchpad bug 512321 in linux-fsl-imx51 "please backport devtmpfs to the lucid linux-imx51 kernel tree" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/512321 13:04 < asac> cooloney cant attend today, so we should move his item forward 13:04 -!- hyperair [n=hyperair@ubuntu/member/hyperair] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 13:04 < JamieBennett> :) 13:04 < asac> [ACTION] cooloney to investigate lucid kernel patches that may need back-porting 13:04 < ogra> my imx51 install is booting incredibly fast atm :) 13:04 < JamieBennett> cool 13:04 < ogra> NCommander, make sure thats enabled in dove too ^^^ 13:04 < davidm> G'day NCommander 13:04 < NCommander> hey DavidLevin 13:04 < NCommander> ... 13:04 < NCommander> tab complete failure 13:04 < ogra> heh 13:05 < NCommander> hey davidm 13:05 < davidm> bummber about mootbot 13:05 < NCommander> * ericm and NCommander to investigate what causes the gnome-panel crash/restart cycle 13:05 < asac> [ACTION] NCommander to ensure that dove gets devtmpfs lucid bits backported too 13:05 * persia has begun the process of poking appropriate people 13:05 * NCommander takes actions 13:06 < ogra> asac, no need to backport, just enabling 13:06 < ogra> devtmpfs is in .32 13:06 < asac> NCommander: so the gnome-panel crashes are gone? 13:06 < asac> plars: ? 13:06 < plars> no, I saw a gnome panel crash yesterday 13:06 < NCommander> asac, unfortunately no. Last week was a wash for me due to sickness so I didn't look into it 13:06 < plars> that was on imx51 13:06 < asac> plars: a crash ... or constant crashing? 13:06 < NCommander> Seems to be unrelated to our general hanging issue on Dove 13:06 < asac> NCommander: no problem 13:06 < ogra> plars, uuh 13:06 * ogra hasnt seen any yet 13:06 < plars> err, on dove actually 13:06 < plars> sorry 13:07 < ogra> phew 13:07 < plars> on imx51 it was one of the few things that was fine 13:07 * ogra swipes sweat off forehead 13:07 < plars> I think the root of most of my imx51 trouble yesterday was with the usb bug though 13:07 < NCommander> ogra, bah, you should try having some Thumb2 issues. They're a load of fun 13:07 < ogra> which still isnt clear to me its USB though 13:07 < ogra> since the issues obviously affected the livefs on the SD too 13:07 < asac> plars: do we have a bug for gnome-panel crashes? 13:08 < NCommander> ericm_, anything else to add 13:08 < plars> asac: I didn't get a chance yesterday, was going to go looking and make sure it's in today, but I thought there was one for it already 13:08 < asac> thanks 13:08 < GrueMaster> asac bug 512515 13:08 < asac> [ACTION] plars to file a bug on gnome-panel crashes 13:08 < ubottu> Bug 512515 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/512515 is private 13:09 < ogra> bah 13:09 < plars> or possibly 458109... not sure if it's the same problem though 13:09 < asac> GrueMaster: apport hasnt kicked in yet? 13:09 < asac> can you open it? 13:09 < plars> bug 458109 13:09 < ubottu> Launchpad bug 458109 in gnome-panel "gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in free()" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/458109 13:09 < asac> ah 13:09 < ogra> why cant i see 512515 ? 13:09 < persia> 512515 is *very* private. 13:09 < ogra> isnt ubuntu.armel subbed ? 13:09 < plars> nor can I 13:09 < NCommander> asac, apport on ARM been somewhat twichy. The retracer crashed while I was out sick, and I haven't kicked it hard enough yet 13:09 < asac> ogra: i assume its a crash report and apport didnt came a round yet 13:09 < ogra> asac, still the reported needs to sub -armel 13:09 < GrueMaster> yes 13:09 < persia> Ah, that explains the *very* private-ness. 13:09 < asac> right. so if you report crashes from a test install you can definitly open them up 13:10 < ogra> *reporter 13:10 < NCommander> [ACTION] NCommander to raise apport-retracer for armel from the dead 13:10 < asac> manually 13:10 < persia> Well, depends on what one did with the test install :) 13:10 < ogra> yeah 13:10 < asac> heh. you get the point ;) 13:11 < asac> ok 13:11 < NCommander> ** asac, ericm, and NCommander to talk about Thumb2 issues after the meeting and report back. 13:11 < ogra> what was the outcome ? 13:11 < asac> the outcome is that we have three knobs to tune: 13:12 < asac> a) user space apps (try to workaround) 13:12 < asac> b) kernel/toolchain (try to eliminate bad instructions) 13:12 < NCommander> a is bust 13:12 < ogra> a) would affect all of wrmel, no ? 13:12 < ogra> *armel 13:12 < asac> c) hardware (fix hardware) 13:12 * ogra votes for b 13:12 < asac> ogra: well. so atm dove images start again 13:12 < asac> the hangups were caused by python 13:12 < ogra> right 13:12 < asac> the new python and recreating the .pyc's fixed it 13:12 < NCommander> b is semi-difficult to do. I'm tempted to go with c unless we *really* want Dove Y series hardware to work 13:13 < asac> so a) is kind of done, but flaky 13:13 < ogra> well, c means we need to replace the world 13:13 < asac> NCommander is working on b) with ericm (thats my understanding) ... and we are investigating hardware (but that probably takes a bit) 13:13 < ogra> which we'll surely do over time anyway 13:13 < ogra> but that requires speed 13:13 < asac> ogra: a relatively small world though ;) 13:13 < ogra> indeed 13:13 < asac> e.g. just our boards 13:13 < ogra> still takes shipping time etc 13:14 < ogra> and throws us back even more 13:14 < asac> NCommander: i thought you had an idea how to do that 13:14 < asac> what happened to it? 13:14 < NCommander> asac, on a or b? 13:14 < asac> b 13:14 < ogra> b 13:15 < ogra> semi indicates it easy for 50% ;) 13:15 < ogra> *it's 13:15 < NCommander> b is still fermenting, but I'm not sure we can handle the busted vldr instructions 13:15 < NCommander> We could change the toolchain to not use vldr, but that requires rebuilding the world 13:15 < ogra> i thought you discussed a solution with dmart yesterday 13:15 < asac> right. what was the outcome? 13:16 < NCommander> asac, ogra, just bounced ideas around. I don't think we came to a definate plan 13:16 < ogra> hmm, k 13:16 < asac> ok. lets try to keep a) going for now 13:16 < ogra> and c 13:16 < asac> i will talk to dmart and ericm about b) 13:16 < asac> and c) is ongoing anyway 13:17 < ogra> right 13:17 < NCommander> indeed 13:17 < dmart> From my pov, if vldr can't be worked around, the only other options are to change the toolchain, or build in ARM 13:17 < asac> NCommander: so you are off the hook and can do other things until further notice ;) 13:17 < NCommander> woo! 13:17 < dmart> NCommander, wasn't there an erratum patch for the vldr problems, or does it not work even with the patch. 13:18 < NCommander> dmart, the patch requires that the instruction is excuted and then faults 13:18 < ogra> dmart, build in ARM means we lose all improvements on imx51 too, no ? 13:18 < asac> yes ogra 13:18 -!- hyperair [n=hyperair@ubuntu/member/hyperair] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 13:18 < NCommander> dmart, its my understanding that our board hangs just executing the vldr instruction will cause the hang. (think Intel style f00f bug) 13:18 < ogra> thats what i feared 13:18 < dmart> ogra, well, yes, probably :/ 13:19 < dmart> NCommander, I see. Important to clarify the situation on newer hardware then... 13:19 * NCommander has been doing research into the f00f bug 13:19 < NCommander> I'm curious if we can use a similar technique to work around the issue, but most of the proposed fixes abuses things on Intel processors that don't exist on ARM 13:20 < asac> ok. anything else on this that shouldnt be discussed offline? 13:20 * NCommander has nothing 13:20 < NCommander> ** NCommander to investigate ericm's xorg naming bug. 13:20 < NCommander> ... 13:20 * NCommander can't even remember what the naming bug was ... 13:20 < ogra> you skipped two items 13:21 < asac> heh 13:21 < asac> guess thats a carry forward ;) 13:21 < ogra> no 13:21 < asac> [ACTION] * NCommander to investigate ericm's xorg naming bug. 13:21 < ogra> ah 13:21 < asac> huh? he says he cant even remember ;) 13:21 < ogra> i thought you mean the skipped ones 13:22 < NCommander> ogra, i skipped cooloney's ones since he's not here 13:22 < asac> right. 13:22 < ogra> doesnt matter 13:22 < ogra> i can comment on both 13:22 < NCommander> ogra, oh, :-) 13:22 < JamieBennett> xorg was wrongly named no? 13:22 < NCommander> In that case 13:22 < NCommander> ** cooloney to ping fsl for more reliable chip rev checking method. 13:22 < ogra> right 13:22 < ogra> the method is reliable, the bootloaders werent 13:22 < asac> [ACTION] * cooloney to ping fsl for more reliable chip rev checking method. 13:22 < asac> hasnt that happened? 13:22 < asac> right. i thought we have the fix for uboot even 13:22 < ogra> we have bugfixes for uboot but will likely stay with redboot anyway 13:23 < ogra> so that item is gone 13:23 < JamieBennett> boo ;) 13:23 < asac> sure ... but that item is done in any case 13:23 < asac> scratch that action ;) 13:23 < ogra> right 13:23 < ogra> same for the next one 13:23 < ogra> suspend/resume works reliable on imx51 now 13:23 < NCommander> ** persia, asac, Gruemaster to discuss meeting rotation schedule and report back. 13:23 < ogra> all fixed :) 13:24 < asac> we decided that we discuss that during sprint 13:24 < persia> Oh. 13:24 < persia> GrueMaster and I discussed it briefly about 12 hours ago. 13:24 < persia> (but asac was asleep) 13:24 < ogra> evil you ! 13:24 < persia> We decided all times were bad for someone. 13:24 < persia> But I'll get into that more in my Current Items item. 13:25 < NCommander> * Current Items 13:25 < NCommander> ** Readjustment of the meeting schedule to better fit current participants -- persia 13:25 < NCommander> persia, ok, now you can go :-) 13:25 * ogra has no concerns about bad times but we need to make sure to match a proper frequency 13:25 < persia> So, basically no matter what time is selected, it's going to be bad for some folk. 13:25 < asac> right ... i would say, persia should send out suggestions 13:25 < ogra> i.e. i wouldnt change the time in the middle of y release cycle 13:25 < asac> and then we discuss that during sprint 13:25 < ogra> s/y/a/ 13:25 < persia> As a result, we need a weighted analysis of attendees and times, to make it least bad for the smallest number of folk. 13:26 < persia> So, I'll volunteer to send something to ubuntu-mobile@ asking for timezones and availability of people who want to commit to attend the meeting, and collect the responses privately. 13:26 < asac> right. so i see two things are to be decided: 13:26 < ogra> but please regard my above comment too 13:26 < asac> 1. what meeting time to use next 13:26 < persia> I'll send out an a summarised mail (no identities) with the weighted analysis, and good times. 13:26 < asac> 2. how often do we want to change the meeting time (hint: not too often, to help community) 13:27 < ogra> 2 ++ 13:27 < persia> I think rotation is worse than non-rotation. 13:27 * ogra proposes with a release 13:27 < persia> Even if a meeting time is bad for someone, they can probably rearrange things. 13:27 < persia> Rotation makes for lots of rearragement. 13:27 < asac> yes 13:28 < ogra> well, if it stays for 6 months it shouldnt be to hard to do though 13:28 < asac> but having 9/10 regular atttendeed suffer isnt that great 13:28 < persia> Personally, I'm up for reviewing the time anytime there are significant complaints. 13:28 < persia> That doesn't mean it will change, but as we get new participants, and drop old ones, the weighted analysis may suggest better fits. 13:29 < asac> right 13:29 < asac> [ACTION] persia to suggest and coordinate discussion on meeting schedule 13:29 < persia> So, shall I proceed with this plan? 13:29 < persia> Excellent. 13:29 < asac> moving on ... 13:29 < asac> NCommander: ? 13:30 < NCommander> ** Standing Items 13:30 < NCommander> ** * http://macaroni.ubuntu.com/~pitti/workitems/canonical-mobile.html 13:30 < NCommander> ** Kernel Status (cooloney, ericm) 13:30 < ogra> looks good 13:30 < ogra> pretty close to trend 13:31 < JamieBennett> and some are bug linked which will go away soon 13:32 < asac> that url should be using people.canonical.com now 13:32 < asac> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/canonical-mobile.html 13:32 < ogra> someone didnt update the wiki :) 13:32 < asac> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/canonical-mobile-lucid-alpha-3.html 13:33 * NCommander fixes the wiki 13:33 < NCommander> ericm_, how's the Dove kernel ATM? 13:34 < asac> so the itesm start to lack behind 13:34 -!- mok0 [n=mok@ubuntu/member/mok0] has quit ["Leaving."] 13:34 < asac> i will elminate a bunch of the firefox items this week and also get the webservice-email spec on track 13:34 < ogra> what do we do about the uboot spec ? 13:35 < ogra> we had one for redboot taht was swapped for it 13:35 -!- mok0 [n=mok@ubuntu/member/mok0] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 13:35 < ogra> do we swap back ? do we just drop it ? 13:35 < ogra> davidm, asac ? 13:35 < asac> ogra: we should set the status to blocked 13:35 < asac> and communicate the deficiencies to fsl 13:36 < ogra> well, i dont see a way that gets unblocked ever 13:36 < asac> if things get fixed early enough then thats ok 13:36 < ogra> at least for the speed issues 13:36 < ogra> these are uboot design issues 13:36 < asac> otherwise thats the reason we dont switch to uboot and we can postpone the items 13:36 < asac> ogra: uboot works for dove 13:36 < ogra> ok, so no swapping back of the redboot spec then 13:36 < asac> i think we would be fine if we get the same feature set 13:36 < ogra> uboot works for dove but we dont have any alternative :) 13:36 < asac> ogra: lets discuss that after meeting 13:36 < plars> is it the mac address bug that is killing it? 13:37 < asac> [ACTION] asac and ogra to decide what to do with bootloader specs 13:37 < ogra> nor did anyone ever research speed on dove wrt different bootloaders 13:37 < ogra> plars, 23 sec vs 11 sec initiaslization speed and the issue that we still need to pull the kernel off SD 13:37 -!- swe3tdave [n=swe3tdav@ubuntu/member/swe3tdave] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 13:37 < asac> ogra: i am 98% sure that thats a mmc driver bug 13:37 < ogra> which would turn image creation into a horrible thing 13:38 < ogra> asac, no, did you read my mail ? 13:38 < persia> I'm entirely certain it's a driver bug. 13:38 < ogra> no 13:38 < asac> ogra: the loading speed? 13:38 < ogra> did you read my analysis ? 13:38 < persia> I know that there exist i.MX51 implementations that can boot from NVRAM/NVROM 13:38 < ogra> the leoading isnt slow 13:38 < asac> ogra: i read your mail (if it was the mail i think) 13:38 < asac> ogra: the unpacking? 13:38 < ogra> the one i sent today 13:38 < ogra> yes 13:38 < asac> ok 13:38 < ogra> unpacking, initalizing of HW etc 13:39 < asac> i will double check. i think the mail i read was from yesterday night 13:39 < ogra> these are the steps that slow down 13:39 < ogra> i mailed one this morning 13:39 < asac> ogra: for me mmc load alone is slow 13:39 < asac> but lets discuss that after i read you mail 13:39 < ogra> subject: "uboot pro/con list, follow up measuring" 13:39 < asac> lets move on. 13:39 < ogra> right 13:39 < asac> anything on specs=? 13:40 < asac> [topic] Kernel Status (cooloney, ericm) 13:40 < asac> so cooloney isnt here ... ericm? 13:40 < ogra> imx51 looks very good apart from the issues plars sees though 13:41 < ogra> (but that could as well be bootloader induced) 13:41 < plars> planning to retry with sata today, hopefully things will look much better 13:41 < ogra> i'll upload a fresh redboot today, we still use the karmic binary 13:41 < ogra> (since i focused on uboot) 13:43 < asac> ok 13:43 < asac> lets move on 13:43 < asac> [topic] QA Status (GrueMaster, plars) 13:44 * ogra thinks ericm_ fell asleep 13:44 < plars> started working on trying to do pairwise testing 13:44 < asac> great 13:44 < plars> but the first one I started with was the thing I ran into problems with yesterday 13:44 < asac> did you create a wiki to track that run? 13:44 < plars> so not much progress there yet 13:44 < plars> yes 13:44 < plars> but keep in mind this is only a temporary location 13:44 < plars> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/Testing/ArmPairwiseResults 13:44 < asac> plars: that means we already discovered a new bug because of this? that sounds too optimal ;) 13:44 < plars> the tests are already on iso.qa.ubuntu.com 13:45 < plars> but are not visible until after hardy .4 testing 13:45 < asac> very good 13:45 < plars> but anyone should feel free to contribute if you have some spare cycles to try an install 13:45 < plars> poke me if you have questions 13:45 < asac> GrueMaster: any overview/status on daily testing for last week? 13:46 < GrueMaster> Last week I spent too much time trying to get dove to a working point. 13:46 < GrueMaster> Not much went on with IMX51. 13:47 * GrueMaster is gathering a bug list. 13:47 < asac> thanks! 13:48 < GrueMaster> I filed a bug on keytool, which is part of the openjava packages. It segfaults on dove, but not on imx51. 13:48 -!- mhall119|work [n=mhall@ubuntu/member/mhall119] has quit [Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)] 13:48 < asac> right. i remember that 13:49 < ogra> ubiquity doesnt work on imx51 13:49 < GrueMaster> Bug 510954 13:49 < ubottu> Launchpad bug 510954 in openjdk-6 "keytool segfaults on dove but not on imx51" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/510954 13:49 < ogra> at least it didnt for me on sunday 13:49 < ogra> i didnt research it though 13:49 < plars> ogra: it worked for me yesterday - up until flash-kernel died 13:49 < ogra> right 13:49 < GrueMaster> I got ubiquity to install yesterday on IMX51 after doing an apt-get update on the live image. 13:49 < ogra> so it was probably a one time issue with the friday image i had 13:50 < GrueMaster> The issue was a missing package. 13:50 < ogra> plymouth was fixed today btw 13:50 < asac> ok so ubiquity is fixed. 13:50 < asac> was there a bug open? 13:50 < asac> (for any) 13:50 < ogra> nope 13:50 < ogra> but if both are fixed, no need to bother 13:51 -!- mhall119|work [n=mhall@ubuntu/member/mhall119] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 13:51 < asac> ok ... lets move on ... not much time left ;) 13:51 < asac> [ACTION] ARM Application status (JamieBennett, dyfet) 13:51 < JamieBennett> Nothing major to report 13:52 < asac> i guess not much happend there last week. 13:52 < dyfet> Some of the more ambitious ideas were not realizable in this cycle. I proposed a much smaller subset of seed changes for Jamie to consider. 13:52 < JamieBennett> dyfet: this is the canola spec right? 13:52 < dyfet> Yes 13:52 < dyfet> At least I assumed so ;) 13:52 < asac> yes, so i recall that we discussed to not go for canola by default this cycle, but rather just ensure its in the archive 13:52 < JamieBennett> So canola isn't possible for this cycle but it could be a reality for lucid+1 13:53 < JamieBennett> and we are definately interested in that 13:53 < asac> yes 13:53 < dyfet> yes 13:53 < asac> ok thanks. sorry, time is running out ... 13:53 < asac> [TOPIC] ARM Porting/FTBFS status (NCommander, dyfet) 13:53 < asac> i think that looks quite ok on the ftbfs list 13:53 < asac> i failed to assign the issues identified in the thumb2 review 13:53 < ogra> whats the number of the bug you filed for likewise NCommander ? 13:53 < asac> so ... 13:53 < NCommander> I've done some porting of likewise to armel, but it was movre involved than I expected. Should have an initial build done soon. 13:54 < NCommander> ogra, no bug yet, that slipped my mind 13:54 < asac> [ACTION] asac to open bugs and assign for issues identified in thumb2review 13:54 < ogra> gnome-power-manager and squd need some attention 13:54 < asac> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/Thumb2PackageReviewList 13:54 < ogra> and there is still libv4l 13:54 < ogra> *squid 13:54 < dmart> asac, did you want to continue with the review of the universe packages in the Thumb2 list at some point? I did a few, but not very many. 13:55 < ogra> NCommander, please file it :) 13:55 < asac> dmart: yes, we can do another sprint later this week i guess 13:55 < NCommander> ogra, will do 13:55 < ogra> thanks 13:55 < dmart> asac, good plan, please suggest a time. 13:55 < asac> [ACTION] asac and dmart to finish thumb2 review for universe 13:55 < asac> lets discuss time after meeting 13:55 < asac> ... ok hurrying ;) 13:55 < dmart> sure 13:56 < asac> [TOPIC] ARM Image Status (ogra, persia) 13:56 < ogra> already covered for imx51 above 13:56 < persia> Things are finally looking really nice. 13:56 < ogra> all fine ... 13:56 < asac> thats what we want to hear ;) 13:56 < ogra> no idea about dove though 13:56 < ogra> since i didnt test that myself 13:56 < persia> The issues are almost entirely details of image construction (previously covered), and the application stacks are mostly just working. 13:56 < asac> afaik, dove images start and work ... thats more than we thought would happen last week 13:56 < ogra> right 13:56 < asac> thanks to plars for tracking it down to pythong and pybootchart 13:57 < asac> and thanks to doko for getting new python in ;) 13:57 < GrueMaster> None of the alt. images are building atm. 13:57 < ogra> btw, JamieBennett do you still beed bootchart on the images 13:57 < ogra> *need 13:57 -!- jMyles [n=justin@rrcs-24-97-206-244.nys.biz.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 13:57 < ogra> the apport popup is annoying on imx51 :) 13:57 < asac> i think we should keep it there for now ... might be interesting after the debconf fixes went it 13:57 < asac> in 13:57 < persia> GrueMaster: Hrm. I missed that. I'll see if I can't sort it. 13:57 < JamieBennett> ogra: no 13:57 < ogra> and it doesnt seem anyone makes efforts to fix it 13:57 < asac> hmm 13:57 < asac> ok 13:57 < ogra> so lets unseed it 13:57 < plars> I would like to keep bootchart if possible 13:58 < ogra> meh, k 13:58 < plars> not critical, but nice to have 13:58 < persia> plars: Can't you install with image modification if you need it? 13:58 < ogra> plars, when can we remove it ? 13:58 < plars> sure 13:58 < JamieBennett> plars: it's helpful I agree 13:58 < ogra> well, we need to remove it anyway at some point 13:58 < persia> Or can we stick it in the pool, so it's available for install? 13:58 < ogra> that should be possible 13:58 * persia can provide preseeding hints to help get it installed at install-time 13:58 < ogra> a job for StevenK :) 13:58 < JamieBennett> persia: I'm using it in the live-cd ;) 13:59 < asac> yes, its for live images 13:59 < persia> JamieBennett: But you said you didn't need it, so I'm ignoring your use case :) 13:59 < JamieBennett> but I have my investigations done :) 13:59 < asac> do we capture results from it in a daily fashion? 13:59 < ogra> no 13:59 < JamieBennett> no 13:59 < ogra> it was only used for the livefs bootspeed issues (yet) 14:00 < asac> [ACTION] JamieBennett, plars and asac to decide what to do wrt bootchartgui seeding 14:00 < asac> [TOPIC] Ubuntu Liquid 14:00 < asac> persia: rbelem? 14:00 < rbelem> asac, persia and are working on plasma-mobile and kdm-mobile 14:00 < rbelem> asac, plasma-mobile is already in revu 14:00 < asac> right. i saw that. 14:01 < rbelem> and some minor fixes are needed 14:01 < asac> so you are making good progress on those two. 14:01 < asac> what will come after that? 14:01 < rbelem> yep 14:01 < rbelem> we will work on kdebase-workspace 14:01 < persia> We still have a kwin module to get in, and then we should be able to push a base -meta and -default-settings 14:01 < persia> There's stuff not exposed in the monolithic KDE libraries that we need to investigate more. 14:02 < rbelem> to expose some kcontrol libs 14:02 -!- pendulum_ [n=pendulum@pdpc/supporter/active/Pendulum] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 14:02 < asac> ok. i assume thats coordinated with riddell? 14:02 < rbelem> kdm-mobile depens on it 14:02 -!- mjeanson [n=mjeanson@219.40-ppp.3menatwork.com] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 14:02 < rbelem> yep 14:02 < rbelem> we will make the changes and send to him 14:02 < persia> Well, kinda. Until we finish the investigation we don't have a lot to propose, but we're definitely working with #kubuntu-devel 14:02 -!- jsalisbury [n=chatzill@65.206.2.67] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 14:03 -!- jsalisbury [n=chatzill@65.206.2.67] has quit [Remote closed the connection] 14:03 < rbelem> after that we should work to trim kdm 14:03 < asac> ok. what milestone is liquid aiming for? I assume the kdebase-workspace changes are somewhat bound to the alpha-3 milestone as kubuntu is going for LTS? 14:03 < rbelem> yep 14:04 -!- jsalisbury [n=chatzill@65.206.2.67] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 14:04 < rbelem> our milestone is alpha3 14:04 -!- mjeanson [n=mjeanson@219.40-ppp.3menatwork.com] has left #ubuntu-meeting [] 14:04 < persia> For all the KDE stuff. We might end up with some tweaks all the way to FF to get other stuff clean. 14:04 < asac> ok. so try to align your priorities so that things that need to be changed in software that is shipped by others is done around alpha-3 14:04 < persia> PRecisely. 14:04 < asac> if liquid-only things come a later its not a big deal imo 14:05 < rbelem> cool! 14:05 < rbelem> :-) 14:05 < persia> Well, we want to get at least -meta and -default-settings in by FF. 14:05 < persia> But they might not be 100% feature-complete at that point. 14:05 < persia> (package add being more invasive than bugfix stuff, even large bugfix, if nobody else installs the things) 14:05 < asac> sure. but if you have to decide what to do first, i would suggest to do the changes that have impact on kubuntu first ;) 14:06 -!- DavidLevin [n=dslevin@67-210-33-186.ul.warwick.net] has quit [Client Quit] 14:06 < persia> Absolutely. kdm/kwin are the big things now, because they need to build against stuff that we might need to expose from kdebase-workspace (as above) 14:06 < asac> well. not if those packages have no impact on other products imo ... but yes, FF should be the goal 14:06 < asac> ok. but feels its on track 14:06 < rbelem> :-) 14:06 < asac> if anything is needed just shout ;) 14:07 < persia> We will. 14:07 < asac> sorry, to cut off but we are overdue ;) 14:07 < asac> [TOPIC] AOB 14:07 < ogra> doesnt include beer :) 14:07 < ogra> or does it ? :) 14:07 * NCommander thanks asac for taking over 14:07 < asac> NCommander: np 14:08 < asac> one thing from me: lets try to add our acitivites to the wiki _before_ the meeting ;) 14:08 * asac slaps himself 14:08 < ogra> meh 14:08 -!- shriekout_ [n=shriekou@124.216.208.61] has joined #ubuntu-meeting 14:08 * ogra totally forgot about it ... 14:08 -!- shriekout_ [n=shriekou@124.216.208.61] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)] 14:09 < ogra> i'm missing JamieBennett'S nice remonders 14:09 < JamieBennett> :) 14:09 < ogra> *reminders 14:09 < asac> thougth we had one ping 14:09 < asac> guess jamie was too busy last week to do that on friday 14:09 < asac> also i think i failed to send out the meeting minutes last week ... is that correct? 14:09 < JamieBennett> I'll start them back up on fridays 14:09 < JamieBennett> asac: yes 14:09 * asac hides 14:10 < JamieBennett> I wrote them on the wiki though 14:10 < ogra> there are always the logs 14:10 < asac> JamieBennett: will you send both? or want me to still send last weeks minutes? 14:10 < JamieBennett> asac: I can do both 14:10 < persia> logs generally hit the TLDR barrier. Minutes are better. 14:10 < asac> thanks. /me owe's JamieBennett a cookie ;) 14:10 < asac> yes, minutes are much bettter 14:10 < asac> especially if they are so well prepared as ours 14:10 < asac> on the wiki ;) 14:11 < JamieBennett> :) 14:11 < asac> ok thaks all
ARM/Meeting/2010/20100126 (last edited 2011-07-28 17:58:17 by pool-96-226-234-14)